 |
Welcome to the Natami / Amiga ForumThis forum is for AMIGA fans interested in the new NATAMI platform.
Please read the forum usage manual.
|
Welcome to the Natami lounge. Meet new AMIGA friends here and enjoy having a friendly chit chat. |
| I Am Getting Old Waiting for Natami | page 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
|---|
|
|---|
Niclas Aronsson Sweden
| | Posts 57 24 Jun 2012 07:43
| Thierry you give me flashbacks of myself 20 years ago :) But many of your points are quite moot. For example what do "proper" istall of windows 7 mean ? My windows 7 partition is 30 Gb AND i have NERO, ACDSee, TotalCommander, etc installed on the same partition. So that only win 7 takes 70gb install is just plain wrong. I run x64 ultimate version. Have 8gb ram and no page file. Haven't used a page file since 2001 when i first istalled win 2000. //N
| |
Thierry Atheist Canada
| | Posts 1830 24 Jun 2012 10:21
| Niclas Aronsson wrote:
| Thierry you give me flashbacks of myself 20 years ago :)But many of your points are quite moot. For example what do "proper" istall of windows 7 mean ? My windows 7 partition is 30 Gb AND i have NERO, ACDSee, TotalCommander, etc installed on the same partition. So that only win 7 takes 70gb install is just plain wrong.
|
Hi Niclas,windows 7, when I installed it, it used about 15 gigabytes, then with updates from when the DVD was issued it added about another 2 gigabytes of used space. It says "if you want windows XP compatibility, you need another 20 gigabytes of HD space"!!! On XP, if you had a full 4 gigabytes of RAM (3.5 usable by the "OS") the "os" wants ANOTHER 1.5 times as much SWAP FILE SPACE on your hard drive too.... That means ANOTHER ~6 Gigabytes (I saw that the swap file on xp was closer to 6.8 Gigs) of hard drive used up. On windows 7, I have 16 Gigabytes of RAM translating to TWENTY FOUR gigabytes of hard drive space MORE. 17+20+24=61.... but I want to get... I HAVE to get THIRTY TWO gigabytes of RAM (the most my motherboard supports) meaning that I need 17+20+48= 85 GIGABYTES of hard drive space is needed for the "so called os" to "function".... BUT... we're not done yet!!!!! Let's look at the first number. 61 Gigabytes of space is needed for windows 7 to work. The "os" says "you should ALWAYS have 10% of the hard drive free or else you can't do a defragment, and the system will also slow down as you're nearing a 'full state' on the hard drive" (not to mention that insanely annoying bubble popping up all the time saying "running out of space soon"). While that's all good, you STILL may want to consider the recycle bin area. So, if BOTH are 10% that would lead you to need 61/.80=76.25 Gigabytes of SSD space JUST for the windows 7 install. They DON'T write THAT on the windross box.
| |
Sascha B Germany
| | Posts 131 24 Jun 2012 10:37
| Thierry Atheist wrote:
| was forced to turn computer off with power button, something YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DO!!!!!!!!! |
One of the many reason why I only use Linux on x86 computer since a long time. Windows is too much annoying. Win7 on Netbook was erased before 1st start ;)In this case AmigaOS is very relaxing and has a friendly feeling :) And this is the HDD usage of my root partition: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 14G 5,8G 7,3G 45% / Only 5,8GB used with all kind of program/package I need until now (LibreOffice included).
| |
Marcel Verdaasdonk Netherlands
| | Posts 3991 24 Jun 2012 11:02
| thierry your math is flawed besides that the swapfile can be turned off when you have a x64 windows version with 8GB of RAM. This would actually speed up the system using a swapfile while you have more then that makes very little sense.And why do you need a RAM drive? the disk access is a magnitude faster then it was on a Amiga. Besides that my windows installment is only 17GB with all updates installed!!!(okay i tweaked the register)
| |
Wojtek P Poland
| | Posts 1597 24 Jun 2012 18:47
| Marcel Verdaasdonk wrote:
| thierry your math is flawed besides that the swapfile can be turned off when you have a x64 windows version with 8GB of RAM. This would actually speed up the system using a swapfile while you have more then that makes very little sense. And why do you need a RAM drive? the disk access is a magnitude faster then it was on a Amiga. Besides that my windows installment is only 17GB with all updates installed!!!(okay i tweaked the register)
|
Got back and see i must respond and tell you - Amiga "believers" that you don't really understand what is the real power of that computing."You may turn off swap with just 8GB RAM". It's one of the best joke i've heard for a long. Yes - 8192 MEGABYTES. Compare it to 512kB RAM+256kB ROM in A500. without swap. without hard disk. With shorter boot time than windoze 7. What was giving red alert to me since i started to read that forum at all, was that most of people here, including engineers creating natami, use windows, or some click-click-don't-understand modern linux distro. Both are same. Bloatware and lot of work done to prevent understanding what's going on. Even worse i was really shocked after hearing that these engineers use java and claim it is great language. With this - are people at natami actually on the side of understanding the power of Amiga? I don't think so, because the power of Amiga is PROPERLY DONE SOFTWARE. No "new technology", no java, no C++, no stupid things, just proper good coding. Another shock i've got was about Amiga "believers" wanted firefox and openoffice ported to Natami - the classic XXI century bloatware. This is another clear example of not understanding what is Amiga about. With people here being that way - how can i believe it will ever be revived, instead of - making another minimig to play old games - another abuse of trademark without anything real. I just don't believe. I believe in fact. The facts are sad - people don't really understand what was and is Amiga about. As someone pointed out it is something wrong with windoze 7 that it took 80GB of space, and i can easily trim it down to "only" 10GB, this are still fundamental problems: - why it needs that much - why you don't have any control what's going on with your computer. And remember my own posts about my statement that most people do not really need personal computer. It is now even more true than ever.
| |
Marcel Verdaasdonk Netherlands
| | Posts 3991 24 Jun 2012 19:56
| Wojtek call me spoiled but i can put up to 512MB in my modified Amiga if i can just get my hands on some 128MB SIMM modules.(Yes, i did finish my project) Only valid reason for me to go for a Natami is for the increase in bandwidth, and of course that the likely hood of system dying reduces.
| |
Richard Maudsley United Kingdom
| | Posts 821 24 Jun 2012 21:55
| Wojtek P wrote:
| Got back and see i must respond and tell you - Amiga "believers" that you don't really understand what is the real power of that computing. "You may turn off swap with just 8GB RAM". It's one of the best joke i've heard for a long. Yes - 8192 MEGABYTES. Compare it to 512kB RAM+256kB ROM in A500. without swap. without hard disk. With shorter boot time than windoze 7. What was giving red alert to me since i started to read that forum at all, was that most of people here, including engineers creating natami, use windows, or some click-click-don't-understand modern linux distro. Both are same. Bloatware and lot of work done to prevent understanding what's going on. Even worse i was really shocked after hearing that these engineers use java and claim it is great language. With this - are people at natami actually on the side of understanding the power of Amiga? I don't think so, because the power of Amiga is PROPERLY DONE SOFTWARE. No "new technology", no java, no C++, no stupid things, just proper good coding. Another shock i've got was about Amiga "believers" wanted firefox and openoffice ported to Natami - the classic XXI century bloatware. This is another clear example of not understanding what is Amiga about. With people here being that way - how can i believe it will ever be revived, instead of - making another minimig to play old games - another abuse of trademark without anything real. I just don't believe. I believe in fact. The facts are sad - people don't really understand what was and is Amiga about. As someone pointed out it is something wrong with windoze 7 that it took 80GB of space, and i can easily trim it down to "only" 10GB, this are still fundamental problems: - why it needs that much - why you don't have any control what's going on with your computer. And remember my own posts about my statement that most people do not really need personal computer. It is now even more true than ever. |
Yes, we've heard before. You're an elitist who screams YOU SHOULD HAVE TO BE ABLE TO PROGRAM COMPUTERS TO OWN ONE every time grandma asks how to put pictures on facebook. You never bring anything new to the conversation. We've heard all you have to say. Please leave.
| |
Jacek Rafal Tatko Espania
| | Posts 607 25 Jun 2012 01:05
| Everyone is welcome and from all we learn ... even from repetitions we learn ... patience . Many points Wojtek mentions are only true ... no need to quarrel , get some more important stuff done in the mean-while .
| |
Thierry Atheist Canada
| | Posts 1830 25 Jun 2012 01:47
| This is something new. EXTERNAL LINK It says that there's a 500 megabyte file to download, and another 15 megabyte one too. But how big is it really?
| |
Marcel Verdaasdonk Netherlands
| | Posts 3991 25 Jun 2012 13:22
| Thierry your one of those, now that makes the piece fall into place.
| |
Christophe Prevotaux Canada
| | Posts 47 27 Jun 2012 00:57
| Marcel Verdaasdonk wrote:
| Wojtek call me spoiled but i can put up to 512MB in my modified Amiga if i can just get my hands on some 128MB SIMM modules.(Yes, i did finish my project) Only valid reason for me to go for a Natami is for the increase in bandwidth, and of course that the likely hood of system dying reduces.
|
I totally agree with you, however, that would be true if the Natami project was fully open source so you could make sure that you could build/repair/improve/evolve/duplicate ad infinitum the hardware / software / firmware with the components available then, therefore effectively freeing yourself from any dependencies (except for components). I sometimes dream of an electronic component manufacturing from scratch open source movement, but this is just a dream so far :)
| |
Jens Drößler Germany
| | Posts 137 27 Jun 2012 02:25
| It's always amazingly funny to read Thierrys postings. So much nonsense, so much things to get wrong, it's like written slapstick. I guess it's an ecomenical matter to him. Here is a story, a true one. Windows got big because every damn layer and API since the dawn of time has to be still working on the most current version. Thierry says "bad, Satan, me not likeeee". The truth is: That's exactly what Natami does! Everything that is working on an old Amiga will work here too. No cutting old stuff to get more efficient, because it wouldn't be an Amiga. People like Thierry don't realise that the gigs of RAM, the Teras of HDD are only cheap, because people NEED it. What is the problem with 70Gig for Win7 (which I never ever reached) when 2TB are cheaper than 40MB back in the days of the A1200? What is the problem if Win7 takes 1,5Gig of RAM to run of 4Gig available when it costs as much as 5 packs of cigarettes? What's the problem if Windows7 takes ten times as long to boot than your Amiga setup if you can send it to standby with restarts within seconds and even taking less power than an C64 power supply dissipates even when the computer is turned off? You want to edit 1080p video and are pissed that 8Gigs of RAM without swap to HDD won't work? Try to do it on an Amiga and see how THAT works. Hell, try it on Natami, even if you find someone that codes you a soft that will let you do that, you will sit there forever and ever just to edit a few seconds without hardware acceleration of H264 and with the rather slow CPU (compared to current x84 or x64 CPUs). These are things where the OS doesn't matter, but brute force processing power does. I love my Amigas, I'll always have fond memories of the times when I started to make music, draw, make animations, cut some simple videos and stuff. It was a good system and it still has its charm, which is why I'm interested in the Natami. But what you expect from the Natami, Thierry, can and will never be fulfilled. You are bound to be disappointed. things are like they are for a reason. You can accept this or you can go on ranting like an old man how everything was better in your youth. I for one like what I got today, like encoding MP3s within seconds, far faster than realtime, processing audio in a quality that wasn't even imaginable by regular Amiga musicians, having 1080p video playback with 15% CPU load and much much more. I don't care what processor I have to have this power, or what operationg system, but the fact is: x64 and Windows is by far the cheapest way to get this!
| |
Marcel Verdaasdonk Netherlands
| | Posts 3991 27 Jun 2012 06:30
| Thierry IMHO is not a computer illiterate, however since he hold onto the old times for so long i think it is fair to call him a digibeet.
| |
Thierry Atheist Canada
| | Posts 1830 27 Jun 2012 08:29
| Hi Jens. Nice to hear from you. :-))) But hey, what's up with HTML now???? I have found it, no matter how I alter my HTML code, to make the mirror character of / to appear on the screen!!!!???!?!?!?!!!! FIRST you have to figure out that it's an "entity character"....AND THEN, ..... HALF the places that "have a list of these"..... DO NOT LIST IT!!!!!!!!!!! Firefox and Chrome will NOT respond to the & # xx code!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DOES NO ONE ON THE PLANET USE IT???????????????? TIME TO RE-INVENT HTML! Oh and, the web page building software kept introducing anomalous characters with every save that TRASHED THE REST OF THE PAGE TOO!!!!!!!!!
| |
Wojtek P Poland
| | Posts 1597 27 Jun 2012 08:43
| Richard Maudsley wrote:
| You never bring anything new to the conversation. We've heard all you have to say. Please leave.
|
You are already well know here for purely aggressive behaviour and lack of technical argument.
| |
Wojtek P Poland
| | Posts 1597 27 Jun 2012 08:45
| Marcel Verdaasdonk wrote:
| Wojtek call me spoiled but i can put up to 512MB in my modified Amiga if i can just get my hands on some 128MB SIMM modules.(Yes, i did finish my project) Only valid reason for me to go for a Natami is for the increase in bandwidth, and of course that the likely hood of system dying reduces.
|
More RAM, more disk space or more CPU power will not make bad programs a good one. Only less slow, not more consistent or less buggy.Modern programs are not just pure bloat. They doesn't make sense.
| |
Wojtek P Poland
| | Posts 1597 27 Jun 2012 08:51
| Jens Drößler wrote:
| People like Thierry don't realise that the gigs of RAM, the Teras of HDD are only cheap, because people NEED it. What is the problem with 70Gig for Win7 (which I never ever reached) when 2TB are cheaper than 40MB back in the days of the A1200? |
True. But you (and most people) don't realize that at the moment people will not want more new things, or at least - will want it less intensively, will be a moment of collapse of IT hardware industry, which depends of exponential growth. The moment is now. The self-accelerating feedback will be fully visible within 3 years at most. Finally there will be no "high end" hardware. Of course lower end fabs would still exist and work happy, and normal programmers will have a lot to do with normal programs. Bloatware will disappear just as "modern" computers will fail, which is quick as today hardware is designed to last 2 years. Natami style machine could be produced with relatively low end fabs. OF course if it will be produced at all, which is unlikely.
| |
Richard Maudsley United Kingdom
| | Posts 821 27 Jun 2012 14:25
| Wojtek P wrote:
|
Richard Maudsley wrote:
| You never bring anything new to the conversation. We've heard all you have to say. Please leave. |
You are already well know here for purely aggressive behaviour and lack of technical argument.
|
And you brand everyone unwilling to use their pc through an altair front panel unworthy of owning one. Single step yourself under a bus, thanks.
| |
Thomas Richter Germany
| | (MX-Board Owner) Posts 1425 27 Jun 2012 16:10
| Wojtek P wrote:
| True. But you (and most people) don't realize that at the moment people will not want more new things, or at least - will want it less intensively, will be a moment of collapse of IT hardware industry, which depends of exponential growth. The moment is now.
|
Actually - who are you that you think that you know what people want or do not want? In my humble understanding, they want devices that help them in their all-day life. Whether that takes 4GBs to do is irrelevant. Actually, what GB actually *is* is quite irrelevant.Fact is, today's machines do that better than back then, but whether 4GB are justified for that or not does not matter. Because you have the 4GB available for a cheap price, so problem solved.
| |
Richard Maudsley United Kingdom
| | Posts 821 27 Jun 2012 21:52
| I couldn't agree more.
| |
|
|
|
|