| Web Browser Natami | page 1 2 3
|
|---|
|
|---|
Michael Ward USA
| | Posts 176 01 Mar 2010 04:00
| Obviously I use Aweb and Ibrowse like everyone else. Both dated and at least one of them seemingly not under active development. So I have been trying Netsurf 68K lately. This is probably near impossible to run on a real Amiga, even one with 060 and loads of RAM. (have heard mixed reviews from people with these power machines). It certainly will not run on my 040 A3000 with its factory 2/16MB RAM configuration. So my experience with Netsurf has been in UAE exclusively where I have the luxury of 4Ghz and crazy RAM settings in UAE. Then it does run fairly decent (better ability than Aweb or Ibrowse), although I have yet to discover how to play Flash Player content. You Tube videos are doable if you use the button for it within Netsurf. So here is my question; Is there a Web Browser engine out there that is fully featured yet friendly enough for lesser powered 68K Amiga's? OWB pretty popular in other Amiga platforms but I have not used yet. Webkit seems like it is ok. Whether it is better than CSS based Netsurf, I do not know as I am non web expert. The other question is, will there be a modern browser that does not rely on RTG like Netsurf snd others do? Right now for real A3000, my choice is Ibrowse. It actually runs decent on this system although I do not obviously get to see web pages as good as Netsurf. What would be best Web Browser for Natami? Would it be worth making a Natami specific version? Lots of work I'm sure but I would think it would run quite efficiently.....update tried old cruddy version of OWB 68k. No luck in UAE. Seems to require AmiTCP (according to snoop dos). I have not known AmiTCP to get along with how UAE interfaces with base OS networking. I do not know if it is even worth trying on my real amiga that does have amitcp because it does not meet memory requirements. All of these newer browsers like lots of ram. Not like Ibrowse which is quite thrifty, and I suppose Aweb too. seeing various problems with Netsurf 68K. Freezes during form type entry operations, like posting to Natami Forum.... There are other little things as well so it looks like these guys have a little polishing to do yet. Not sure this is right but it seems like many web sites out there using java aspects thus AWeb and IBrowse would always be screwed in these situations. Not sure how OWB or Netsurf handle this. Stupid Java.....
| |
Olaf Schoenweiss Germany
| | (Natami Team Member) Posts 205 01 Mar 2010 10:59
| i know many webpages using javascript and flash, so both are important. And netsurf will at least support javascript (no flash-plugin). I do not know that much webpages using java applets
| |
Christian Kummerow Germany
| | Posts 171 01 Mar 2010 11:13
| The new Browsers miss a lot of features(specialy settings), are slow and buggy. As i remember one needs the buggy exec.library from BB2, this dont work stable/fast on both A1200/A4000 for me.Aweb seems too really death now, no response from the main dev, sites offline. But AWeb is still open source. What it need is newer stable javascript support and css. The Problem is there seem no intrested developers. For me this project is to big, i make some simply modification but i have no knowledge about javascript, css or how to fit it into the source.
| |
Michael v. Parent France
| | (Natami Team Member) Posts 274 01 Mar 2010 14:16
| starting from an opensource browser seems like a good idea and I personally think its critical that Natami comes bundled with a VERY nice and functional web browser, so I hope that enough good programmers can get together to make this happen.
| |
Michael Ward USA
| | Posts 176 01 Mar 2010 17:44
| ....I personally think its critical that Natami comes bundled with a VERY nice and functional web browser Agreed. The question is...is it realistically feasible to go after a native chipset capable browser? A catch 22 by not having easier RTG route. What would expert programmers have to say here?
| |
Gunnar von Boehn Germany
| | (Natami Team Member) Posts 3738 01 Mar 2010 18:42
| Michael Ward wrote:
| ....I personally think its critical that Natami comes bundled with a VERY nice and functional web browser
|
A good web-browser is today certainly the most important application. Bundling AWEB wpould be on option. AWEB would allow easy acces to the most important websites at lest. (AMINET and NATAMI.net) And a well configured AWEB renders at least the NATAMI Website and its Forum 100% correctly. :-) OWB or Netsurf might become good alternatives too. I've little experience with them but I assumethat they have still room for tuning and enhancing for AOS.
| |
Michael Evans Canada
| | Posts 33 01 Mar 2010 19:51
| Gunnar von Boehn wrote:
|
Michael Ward wrote:
| ....I personally think its critical that Natami comes bundled with a VERY nice and functional web browser |
A good web-browser is today certainly the most important application. Bundling AWEB wpould be on option. AWEB would allow easy acces to the most important websites at lest. (AMINET and NATAMI.net) And a well configured AWEB renders at least the NATAMI Website and its Forum 100% correctly. :-)
|
AWeb? Are you serious? AWeb is crap. A good CSS-capable web browser is the one critical application needed for Natami to be useful as a "modern" Amiga. I assumed some people on the Natami Team were actively working on a new or updated browser. If that hasn't even been started yet, I am very, VERY disappointed. Get the priorities straight! Why work on stupid games when you don't even have a web browser?!
| |
Marcel Verdaasdonk Netherlands
| | Posts 2100 01 Mar 2010 20:26
| Michael Evans wrote:
| Get the priorities straight! Why work on stupid games when you don't even have a web browser?!
|
But games are fun... Right?
| |
Michael Evans Canada
| | Posts 33 01 Mar 2010 21:19
| Marcel Verdaasdonk wrote:
| But games are fun... Right?
|
Yes... but since Natami will be able to run the 5000 or so existing Amiga games, new games can certainly wait. An updated browser is urgently required.
| |
Wawa Tk Germany
| | Posts 351 01 Mar 2010 21:37
| netsurf has no javascript yet. just fyi. owb would have but there is no up to date port atm. while its been suggested that someone is working on it according to fab who has done mos port.
| |
Michael Ward USA
| | Posts 176 01 Mar 2010 22:45
| ....netsurf has no javascript yet. just fyi. owb would have but there is no up to date port atm. while its been suggested that someone is working on it according to fab who has done mos port.... This has been my conclusion after a day of playing around with these things. Again, Netsurf the best I have seen yet in 68K but no java, resource greedy, and tied to RTG video. So for starters; from a coding standpoint, what would be required to adapt Netsurf to run on AGA or Natami improved AGA? I understand that java a different animal altogether.... CSS and XML seem like they are in every modern web browser these days. Netsurf already CSS. Many browsers also support XML. This is interesting because 'Feelin' is a system that does both. As far as I know, nobody has really developed with 'Feelin'. So would this be useful? EXTERNAL LINK
| |
Gunnar von Boehn Germany
| | (Natami Team Member) Posts 3738 02 Mar 2010 06:34
| Michael Evans wrote:
| AWeb? Are you serious? AWeb is crap. |
I assume you don't know that I used to be part of the AWEB development-team, right? If you knew than you certainly have an interesting way to make new friends.
| |
Gunnar von Boehn Germany
| | (Natami Team Member) Posts 3738 02 Mar 2010 06:36
| Michael Ward wrote:
| ...what would be required to adapt Netsurf to run on AGA or Natami improved AGA?
|
I would not adapt it at all. RTG is fine. S-AGA has chunky support which means getting CyberGFX or Picasso natively running on S-AGA will be easy.
| |
Olaf Schoenweiss Germany
| | (Natami Team Member) Posts 205 02 Mar 2010 10:38
| i corresponded with one of the developer of netsurf. he said one reason for him to work with is natami. so there will be a natami-version :-) And one of the thing they work on is javascript-support. The only missing is a flash-plugin. Java (applets) are not very often used.
| |
Thomas Clarke United Kingdom
| | Posts 135 02 Mar 2010 11:52
| Michael Evans wrote:
| Get the priorities straight! Why work on stupid games when you don't even have a web browser?! |
No, their priorities are correct. The most important thing to get the Natami hardware out and to have software that can be used to test and demonstrate the new power of the Natami, games are a much better fit for this. Once the hardware is released then other developers will release web browsers, as you can see from this thread there are already browsers that work on 68k Amigas to some degree or another. The reasons it makes sense to bundle Natami with AWeb first is that it's lighter on resources and open-source. When Netsurf and OWB are more mature on 68k then these can be bundled too, but there's nothing stopping you trying out these apps in the meantime. You can't expect the Natami team to provide software for every computer use you have, the main project is the hardware, the strengths and limitations of the software choices will be the same as other 68k Amigas, at least initially.
| |
Michael Ward USA
| | Posts 176 02 Mar 2010 14:42
| .....S-AGA has chunky support which means getting CyberGFX or Picasso natively running on S-AGA will be easy.... Outstanding. I did not know this. This will really open things up for the Natami in general because there a lot of good RTG apps out there. Combine this ability and Natami's ability for good game type stuff via sAGA and I would tend to think this will be a real nifty machine. .....And one of the thing they work on is javascript-support. The only missing is a flash-plugin. Java (applets) are not very often used..... I did read through Netsurf Development plan and saw javascript as a future priority. In regards to Flash plugin, would code aspects of latest Ibrowse version be useful to the cause? So it looks like we just need to let the developers do their thing. Artur Jarosik and Bernd Roesch look like the 68k developers here. If they are like any other of you developers, they probably do this all in their spare time so my question is, what could community do to help? I am useless from coding standpoint but would make money donation if they set something like that up. ....I assume you don't know that I used to be part of the AWEB development-team, right?.... I didn't know this Gunnar. I knew you made optimized versions though. So from your insiders view, is AWeb something that could be further developed or is it best to see what transpires with OWB or Netsurf?
| |
Michael Evans Canada
| | Posts 33 02 Mar 2010 18:31
| Gunnar von Boehn wrote:
| I assume you don't know that I used to be part of the AWEB development-team, right? If you knew than you certainly have an interesting way to make new friends.
|
Uh... no... I didn't know that. AWeb is... uh... good. ;) (...seriously though, I only mean it's comparatively crap... compared to "modern" browsers) In that case, I am surprised that development on AWeb has stopped. I would have thought that you, being an AWeb developer, would have been working hard updating it for use on Natami. YEARS have been wasted. Even if somebody starts programming/updating a browser now, it'll take a year or two to get something decent. Having a reasonably good browser on Natami for its release would have pushed it beyond just a "retro hobby toy" to something actually useful for daily use. Think about how this would increase Natami sales. If you take a look on the "alternative OS" forums, people interested in this sort of thing always ask, "Does it have a decent web-browser?" If you say, "it has a browser... but it doesn't do CSS... and Javascript doesn't work properly... and it's actually a 10-year-old browser that isn't being developed anymore" they will certainly lose interest. Think about it - all you need is a good browser and Natami will be able to use Google Docs - and there you have a complete up-to-date Office Suite. Then you can say, "Yes, Natami has a good browser. Yes, Natami can open/edit all the latest Microsoft Office files. Yes, Natami can do almost everything a modern computer can do." (...that last one is a bit of a cheat ;) Is Natami just going to be a retro games machine? I thought the purpose of Natami was to be an updated Amiga. Amiga was NOT a games machine. It was a computer that just happened to be extremely good for games. Pushing the Natami's gaming capabilities without having a decent browser (or any other modern software) will perpetuate the misconception of the Amiga just being a games machine.
| |
Michael Evans Canada
| | Posts 33 02 Mar 2010 18:57
| Thomas Clarke wrote:
| You can't expect the Natami team to provide software for every computer use you have, the main project is the hardware, the strengths and limitations of the software choices will be the same as other 68k Amigas, at least initially.
|
I don't expect the people working on hardware to do anything but hardware. I really didn't even expect anyone on the Natami team to do any software other than drivers and utility programs to make the Natami work. It's only when I saw that there are many people on the Natami team making games that I thought, "What the hell? One thing Amiga DOESN'T need are more games." They can make games if they want, of course, but I think Natami "Management" (whoever that is) should realise the importance of an updated browser and try to get people working on it, instead of more games. A browser is so important, I think browser developers should be promised a percentage of Natami profits (when there are any), just so they are motivated to get it done.
| |
Mr Copland ;) United Kingdom
| | (Natami Team Member) Posts 452 02 Mar 2010 19:11
| Michael Evans wrote:
| Get the priorities straight! Why work on stupid games when you don't even have a web browser?!
|
Games are why we're doing this. Do you remember the Amiga for it's awesome web browsing? Or for the games? I remember it for many different pieces of software, but as I look around my shelves, I see only games.
| |
Wawa Tk Germany
| | Posts 351 02 Mar 2010 19:28
| alas i must say aweb doesnt make an impression to be very up to date, and beyond that, that it would be eventually updated in the future. it is also comperatively slow, to ibrowse and even to netsurf sdl port would i say. its a pity that it is actually an example what may happen to open sourced code. at current point it would probably be the best chioce to support arti (wo is the one and only developer porting netsurf to 68k for what i know, except for being ocassionally aided by bernd). netsurf 68k needs a mui frontend or similar. bernd is updating storm wizard in the meantime but i have not been told at what it is aimed. its been suggested gtk to miu wrapper will be a solution to this but since it is nit finished even on mos, so i dont know where to look. anyways aweb is a dead end i expect. unfortunatelly.
| |
|