first, I ask permission:)
Thanks

(sorry my bad english jejeje)

And your english that bad my is worse.

Talk u, and later to that.

;)

I spoke england the very best :-P

The way it is now, it'll be expensive, they could sell 300 I would say. BUT, this IS the last chance of replacing OLD HW (minus Zorro bus and custom graphics slot ability, BUT improved on board graphics will make that completely redundant anyway), so I think it could be 1,000 even! In a depression, not EVERYONE is broke. They'll still be making $140 million movies.

* Serial and parallel ports wouldn't hurt.

back on topic or not.
I speak English very wel, maar nicht zo snel maar dat komt nog wel.

Those of you that speak a germanic language might be able to laugh over this.

I don't think you realize just how powerful this Amiga will be!

Genuine Amiga ram:, screen dragging, and multi-tasking....

On my AmigaOne PPC G4 XE with Altivec at 800 MHz I copied a 140 Meg file from ram: to ram: First copy took 19 seconds, when I got to copying the SIXTH time, it took 62 seconds!!!!!! to copy the file from ram: to ram:!!!!! (Every copy took longer periods progressively. Why? No clue!!!!)

The shopping mall has done surveys so they know how much we make in order to know how much they can charge for rent so the stores in turn can overcharge us.

I'm interested in a Natami.

Er spricht englisch sehr gut, aber nicht so schnell aber das kommt noch...

SOS: Rettungring für Thierry!!!

...Coming from 3 rather meaningless art exhibitions, throwing more (programmed) f·arts:) i am hu-e-man

pffffftttt...···'''

How much RAM was in that machine?

2 Gigabytes of ram. PC133MHz ECC Registered SDram.

Let is be clear, Toilet humor we all have here.
Some of us Zealots, others plain interested in Old and New, retro and the other thing.
And to me personaly there is nothing more energizing then hearing about new HW on the horizon, in the morning.
Yes, i said new, Old ideas re-implemented, rethinhing every step of what can we improve here.

back on topic or not.
And to all old skool users ACK ABEND.
(Dunno what i said in the end, perhaps someone does remember some BBS slang.)

Oh, I need to edit in video means working in PAL/NTSC/SECAM/HD/and Movie resolutions/refresh rates/colour handling etc. SVGA/HDMI/DVI used for monitors is only vaguely related to video. Unfortunately, generation after generation of computer user completely misses this fact and blames the hardware when they finally have to "dump to tape". There are software solutions, but the older I get the more experience I have with rejecting them. If you want to work in one format, work natively.... One exception... most six colour bubblejet printers have better internal software than half million dollar Xerox/Fiery printing solutions. Convert RGB to CMYK in software and you get a mess, print it out on a printer the size of a large room and the mess sometimes gets much worse. Print the same image in a Canon or Epsom six colour printer and it will print it almost flawlessly. Create the same image in CMYK and you avoid the problems with the expensive equipment. I have seen more than my share of other peoples SVGA to PAL/NTSC colour disasters. Not to mention all the other problems that happen.

For the top end of live video work need a pile of cards that often have to talk to each other and synchronize with a master clock... normally the incoming/output video clock. If the computer and cards can not sync with the half million dollars of hardware you may have it hooked up to, you are going to be better off buying a turnkey video system. The good news is that as ALL equipment will be HD soon, independent PCIe cards may be able to sync to an external clock. I do not know if it is already possible, or will be possible, I just expect it will be. I do know the base architecture will be unlikely to sync to a request from a card. PC architecture is designed ground up as a computer... The Amiga architecture was designed as a video game console... The output was always intended to be standard TV monitors.

Maybe a problem of memory fragmentation?

What would work? A custom slot, or an Amiga 2000 video slot in a NatAmi, but higher MHz throughput made possible?

Good sggestion, but I did the copying right after I booted up the computer, one right after the other.

This is pointless to do because of two things.
1. No new hardware is available for the Amiga 2000 video slot.
2. A hight frequency, causes backward incompatebility, and because this is a parallel bus system whould introduce a skewing problem at higher speeds and would create the need to increase the bus latency thuse the speed improvement would be less the higher the bus speed is set.

A better way would to completly re-design/re-think the bus used and make it use serial signals and such.
why re invent the wheel if you would ask me.