Are there really so many different methods to produce a CF card? Aren't the manufacturers following the same "standard"?

@others who's contact me for this dump file : yes it's possible, but before i have to remove my whdload key of this dump. be patient please.

thanks

in the last years in amiga land was lots vapour announce great but when see when its available it either not come or it is  a better than nothing solution.

so amiga users are lots tired of all of that.
And as can see in the forum there was told years ago about 3D demos that only natami can do

so wy you not show something of this, only natami can do ?.whats problem about that ?

best is a video of this

in fact i suspect the published screenshots of 3d engine to be some sort of hoax, i do not care much at this point though. perhaps it really would be easier to use a 3d pci gfx board in natami for productivity given existing drivers (aos and aros)rather than creating custom core. there is automatic monitor switching solutions already available but it is up to the devs, certainly.

Bernd Meyer is a good example for this.
Some time ago is was discussed that 68K CPU can reach the same memory performance as PPC systems.
Bernd claimed in relative insulting manner that this was not possible at all. Bernd basically accused us that why lie.
Bernd gave lots of semi-technical examples, true or not true, including claims that MOVE16 is always the fastest to copy memory on 68K - to explain why an 68K can not do what we said.
 
It does not really matter who is right or wrong here. (We were right)
It does not really matter that you can copy memory a lot faster with MOVE.L then with MOVE16 under certain conditions.
It does not really matter that we always were right and that the 68060 has in fact no problem to outrun an Pegasos G3, Efika or AmigaOne G3 in a number of CPU based memory benchmarks.
 
What is annoying is that people in the AMIGA these call you a lier if you do something new.
 
And look how Bernd continued this.
As soon as we posted some screenshot of the NATAMI outrunning PPC Systems in memory performance - Bernd wrote claims about that the benchmark program might be "wrong compiled" to produce too high numbers. So why did he claim this?
 
Bernd continued with posting semi-technical details.
And he also wrote that those numbers will only be correct if the screenmode runs in 29KHz frequency, and he claimed that such modes would not be visible on LCD.
 
All bullshit - as everybody knows AMIGA Productivity is a 29KHz screenmode. And we run this mode all the time on our monitor.
 
Why do people behave like this?
 

Perhaps it is their world view, they have shown all the facts and do not want to see proof shaken.

Things are easy and obvious for us who believe though :)
But for those who don't...

Please continue with your display, and try overlook the people for whom boosting their ego is more important than actual accomplishments. The 3d core is one of the elements I'm looking forward to the most.

Your (the team) is doing an amazing job. :)

Please, if you don't like this project, or just don't care, keep this stuff on AWN. This forum should be for Amiga enthusiasts!

Thanks to everyone who works on this project! It's really exciting to see every bit of it happening! I feel like being 18 again every time there is any news! Good stuff!

The reasons why such people, despite their reservations, follow the development here has probably different causes.

An important reason for such behave would be the history of the Amiga, a story of missed opportunities, a revolutionary computer system at his time far and ultimately advanced but failed.

It is the frustation of these people about it, that there are still enthusiasts, which may not want to give up an outdated concept .

EXTERNAL LINK 
yet hear some of us are skeptical enough that we are non-believers. We still want the Natami and Amiga to succeed and move forward. We recognize what a huge project the Natami is too. The work done is fantastic but then we realize that what looks like small simple parts are missing which holds the project back.  It could take years for all the software support to be written and stable. We still want it despite the high price though. I think that says a lot. Keep up the hard work (and updates) and we'll try a little harder to keep the faith ;)

also i dont quite believe in umisef evil intention. sure he has an own agenda, but except of that, as matt already said many of us have grown a little sceptical over the time. especially those who tried to help to push the platform a little further i believe.

3d core emulation as proof of concept is one thing and an actually working implementation another. as i posted above it doesnt matter for me so much at the moment. first things first. get the dev boards out in the wild and let the people contribute.